Uncategorized__ This page shows a essay that is whole an example of how exactly to structure your content
Example academic essay
Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly come in essays.
If the death penalty be restored in the UK?
The restoration associated with death penalty for serious crimes is a problem of debate in the united kingdom due to the recent rise in violent crime. The reasons, effects and answers to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated by the way that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime to be able to increase circulation and this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will firstly examine this topic by taking into consideration the arguments put forward by those who work in favour of this death penalty and then by looking at the arguments in opposition to the concept.
The key arguments in preference of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that people will be dissuaded from violent crime if they know they are going to face the greatest punishment and that people should face the same treatment that they gave out to others. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we must look at the possibility that other reasons might have result in is essaypro safe this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it is impossible to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support into the evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is a fascinating one: there is certainly a basic appeal in the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights once they kill and that then it shows that we undervalue the right to live if punishments are too lenient. There are more points too in support of the death penalty, one of these simple being cost. It really is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for many years at a time.
The arguments from the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, that it's basically wrong to kill and therefore when the state kills it sends out the wrong message towards the rest of the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This is certainly an interesting argument – would you teach children not to ever hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead suggest to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? Addititionally there is the truth that you might execute innocent people. Innocent people can always be released from prison, nonetheless they can't ever be brought back through the dead. When anyone have already been killed there isn't any chance of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. For this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).
In closing, the arguments put forward by individuals who support or are up against the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences as well as the way people are brought up and are also unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this national country most people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In this situation it may be argued that parliament is in the lead in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the message that is clear killing is always wrong.
You should be in a position to note that this essay comprises of:
An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why this issue is interesting and relevant.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the down sides and issues involved in the topic.
3. An overview regarding the essay.
Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which gives a idea/argument that is main informs us what the entire paragraph is approximately.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward into the topic sentence.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward into the topic sentence together with outside sources.
Summarises the points that are main gives a remedy towards the question.